The Glove-Graze Penalty
Retro trial — Qatar 2022. Szczęsny's glove brushed Messi's face after the header was already gone. Referee Makkelie saw nothing live; the VAR sent him to the monitor and Argentina had a penalty. ESPN's VAR analyst argued it never should have been given. Szczęsny saved it anyway — then the internet opened a file.
The facts, as presented
- Decision
- Penalty awarded (VAR review)
- Referee's call
- No penalty given live; awarded after on-field monitor review
- VAR involvement
- VAR recommended review; Makkelie reversed his call
- Outcome
- Szczęsny saved Messi's penalty; Argentina won 2–0 regardless
You are the juror. Cast your ruling.
The evidence
Clip hosted by its original publisher.
The Tribunal’s Case Notes
What happened
Group C's final round, Argentina needing a result against Poland to be sure of the knockout rounds. In the 36th minute a cross dropped into the Polish box, Messi got his header away, and goalkeeper Wojciech Szczęsny — punching for the ball a beat late — brushed Messi's face with his glove. The header had already gone; nobody appealed with any conviction; referee Danny Makkelie waved play on.
Then the VAR called Makkelie to the monitor. After a long look at the contact, he pointed to the spot. Szczęsny — who had told teammates he would bet on saving it — dived to his left and pushed Messi's penalty away, one of the saves of the tournament. Argentina won 2–0 anyway, both goals from open play, and the penalty became the rare case file where the wronged party fixed the injustice personally, in real time.
The law and the protocol
The legal question is whether a goalkeeper's follow-through contact with an opponent's face, after the ball is gone, is careless under Law 12 — careless contact is a foul; contact that is merely incidental is not. Referees judge force, timing and the availability of the ball. Makkelie's live judgement was 'nothing'; the review changed his mind, which under the protocol means he concluded his first look had missed a clear and obvious error.
ESPN's VAR analyst Dale Johnson was among the voices arguing the penalty should never have been awarded — that glove-to-face contact of that weight, with the header already taken, was below any threshold that gets penalised consistently. The counterargument is straightforward: contact with an opponent's face is exactly the category the protocol asks the VAR to look at twice. The jury decides which reading of 'careless' it believes.
Why the file stayed open
Had Messi scored, this exhibit might be the loudest in the 2022 archive; Szczęsny's save turned it into a curiosity instead — a penalty that changed nothing on the scoreboard and everything in the argument. Fans who defend the tribunal's scepticism point to it as the second VAR-initiated soft penalty of Argentina's group stage, after the Paredes hold against Saudi Arabia. Fans who find the whole theory overcooked point to the same save and note the universe apparently balanced its own books.
The exhibit asks one question only: forget the save, forget the scoreline — was sending Makkelie to the monitor for that contact a correct use of VAR? Fair, Soft VARgentina, or Full VARgentina.
Results reflect fan opinion, not verified wrongdoing.