Vargentina

Barcelona Files · 2006–2017

The Messi Barcelona Referee Files

Chelsea 2009. Arsenal 2011. Real Madrid 2011. PSG 2017. Some of Barcelona's greatest European nights are also some of football's longest-running refereeing arguments. Critics called it UEFAlona. Barcelona supporters called it sour grapes. We rebuilt the case.

13
Cases
7
Verdicts
9
Replays

What the Barcelona files are

Between Messi's Champions League debut season and the 6–1 against PSG, Barcelona played the most scrutinised knockout ties in Europe, and a remarkable number of them ended in an argument about the referee. This collection files those arguments as evidence rather than as folklore: one hub per match, one exhibit per decision, with the state of the tie at the moment of the call, the referee named, the law as it was written that season, and what happened in the minutes afterward.

Two rules shape every page. The topic selection is prosecutorial — these are the matches critics cite — but the adjudication is not. Each exhibit carries the strongest defence of the decision that can honestly be written, and each match hub includes the decisions that went against Barcelona when they matter to the picture, such as Éric Abidal's red card in the same 2009 semifinal that Chelsea still call a robbery.

Where UEFAlona came from

The nickname took hold in the spring of 2009, in the hours after Chelsea's four rejected penalty appeals at Stamford Bridge, and it hardened over the next two seasons: the Van Persie second yellow that turned a tie still level on aggregate, the Pepe red card at 0–0 in the Bernabéu, the accusations from José Mourinho that earned him a UEFA ban. By the time PSG lost a four-goal lead in 2017 with two late decisions against them, the word had become shorthand for a belief, held by a large share of rival supporters, that Barcelona were the competition's protected club.

The defence has always had material to work with. Barcelona went out of the same competition in 2010 after Inter's Thiago Motta was sent off and Bojan's late goal was disallowed; they lost the 2012 semifinal to Chelsea after a penalty miss; several of the decisions above are defensible under the written law even where the threshold looks harsh. The jury is asked to weigh exactly that tension on every exhibit.

What this collection does not claim

Nothing on these pages concludes that a systematic conspiracy existed, that UEFA instructed officials, or that any Champions League match was fixed. The Negreira case — a legal matter concerning club payments to a company linked to a former refereeing official — is separate from every incident here, involves no allegation against Lionel Messi personally, and is not used as evidence about any match. The archive's question is narrower: decision by decision, was the call fair?

The match files

  1. Champions League 2008/09 · Semifinal, second leg

    Chelsea vs Barcelona 2009: The Øvrebø Night, Decision by Decision

    Chelsea 1–1 Barcelona — Champions League 2008/09 Semifinal, Second Leg

    ▶ Replay Chelsea's Last Nine Minutes at the Bridge — playable

  2. Champions League 2010/11 · Round of 16, second leg

    Barcelona vs Arsenal 2011: The Van Persie Red Card, Explained

    Barcelona 3–1 Arsenal — Champions League 2010/11 Round of 16, Second Leg

    ▶ Replay the Tie After the Whistle Nobody Heard — playable

  3. Champions League 2010/11 · Semifinal, first leg

    Real Madrid vs Barcelona 2011: The Pepe Red Card and Mourinho's '¿Por qué?'

    Real Madrid 0–2 Barcelona — Champions League 2010/11 Semifinal, First Leg

    ▶ Replay the Bernabéu After the Red Card — playable

  4. Champions League 2016/17 · Round of 16, second leg

    Barcelona 6–1 PSG: The Remontada's Two Disputed Decisions

    Barcelona 6–1 PSG — Champions League 2016/17 Round of 16, Second Leg

    ▶ Replay the Remontada's Final Minutes as PSG — playable

  5. Champions League 2005/06 · Round of 16, first leg

    Chelsea vs Barcelona 2006: The Del Horno Red Card and Mourinho's 'Theatre'

    Chelsea 1–2 Barcelona — Champions League 2005/06 Round of 16, First Leg

    ▶ Replay the Bridge With Ten Men, 2006 — playable

  6. Champions League 2009/10 · Semifinal, second leg

    Barcelona vs Inter 2010: The Motta Red Card, the Busquets Peek and the Goal That Didn't Count

    Barcelona 1–0 Inter — Champions League 2009/10 Semifinal, Second Leg

    ▶ Replay Camp Nou With Ten Men, 2010 — playable

  7. Champions League 2011/12 · Quarterfinal, second leg

    Barcelona vs Milan 2012: Two Penalties, One Corner and the Kuipers Argument

    Barcelona 3–1 AC Milan — Champions League 2011/12 Quarterfinal, Second Leg

    ▶ Replay Camp Nou After the Second Penalty — playable

  8. Champions League 2013/14 · Round of 16, first leg

    Man City vs Barcelona 2014: The Demichelis Penalty and the Line Nobody Checked

    Manchester City 0–2 Barcelona — Champions League 2013/14 Round of 16, First Leg

    ▶ Replay the Etihad After the Penalty — playable

  9. Champions League 2014/15 · Final, Berlin

    Juventus vs Barcelona 2015 Final: The Pogba Penalty Appeal a Minute Before Suárez

    Juventus 1–3 Barcelona — Champions League 2014/15 Final

    ▶ Replay the Berlin Final From the Pogba Appeal — playable

The strongest cases for the prosecution

  1. Chelsea 2009 — the Piqué handball

    Ten minutes from the final, the ball struck Piqué's outstretched arm in the area and no penalty was given. Contemporary live coverage called it a clear miss.

  2. Chelsea 2009 — the Eto'o handball

    Ballack's stoppage-time shot hit Eto'o's arm moments after Iniesta's equaliser; Ballack chased the referee down the pitch. The fourth appeal of the night.

  3. Arsenal 2011 — the Van Persie second yellow

    A second booking for a shot taken a second after an offside whistle, with the tie level at 3–3 on aggregate. Van Persie said he could not hear the whistle over 95,000 people.

  4. Real Madrid 2011 — the Pepe red

    Sent off at 0–0 for a high challenge on Dani Alves that replays suggested may not have connected. Messi scored twice against ten men.

  5. PSG 2017 — the Suárez penalty

    Awarded in the ninetieth minute with Barcelona needing two goals; critics argued Suárez exaggerated minimal contact from Marquinhos.

  6. PSG 2017 — the Mascherano challenge on Di María

    No penalty was given; Mascherano later said publicly that he had fouled Di María. PSG were still ahead on aggregate at the time.

  7. Manchester City 2014 — the Demichelis penalty

    Red card and penalty at 0–0 for a foul replays suggested began outside the area. UEFA's report does not say where it started; Pellegrini did, and was banned.

  8. Milan 2012 — the corner-pull penalty

    Holding that happens at every corner became a penalty at 1–1 in a quarterfinal; critics said the pull began before the ball was in play and that Puyol was holding Nesta on the same corner.

  9. Juventus 2015 — the Pogba appeal

    A knee and an arm in the box at 1–1 in the final, nothing given, and the winning goal roughly a minute later.

  10. Chelsea 2006 — the Del Horno red

    The first Messi-era dismissal: Mourinho called it theatre, UEFA called it excessive force and kept the card.

The strongest arguments for the defence

  1. Abidal's red card, 2009

    In the same semifinal Chelsea call a robbery, Barcelona's left-back was sent off for a foul on Anelka that replays suggested involved no contact. The night's most clear-cut error, by many accounts, went against Barcelona.

  2. The written law backed several of the calls

    Shooting after the whistle was a caution under Law 12 in 2011. A raised-studs challenge is a red-card offence regardless of contact. Holding at corners is a penalty offence. The argument is about thresholds, which is the jury's job.

  3. Barcelona lost ties with decisions against them

    Inter 2010: a late Bojan goal disallowed, Barcelona eliminated by ten men. Chelsea 2012: a Messi penalty missed and a semifinal lost. The protected-club theory has to explain the exits as well as the escapes.

  4. The 2015 final's officiating cut both ways

    Neymar's header was correctly disallowed for handball minutes after the Pogba appeal, with the help of the additional assistant referee. One Italian review rated the referee's night excellent.

  5. The complainers were sanctioned; so were the errors

    UEFA banned Drogba, Mourinho and Pellegrini for comments about officials — but the referees themselves have acknowledged mistakes in later interviews, and none of the sanctions asserted the decisions were correct.

Play the decisions

VAR Replay drops you into the wronged side at the minute of the call, against a referee whose bias level was set by the jury. Fictional players, real tie states.

▶ VAR ReplayThink you could beat this referee?Replay the match from the disallowed goal — and finish the job.

Community verdict

Across 13 published cases and 7 ballots, the jury’s vote-weighted score is 5.0/10 on the VARgentina Meter — 0 is certified football, 10 is Full VARgentina. The heaviest verdicts:

  1. The Foul That Stopped at the Line10.0/10
  2. The Penalty That Kept the Impossible Alive3.3/10
  3. The Handball Chelsea Never Got2.5/10

Frequently asked

Was Barcelona favoured by referees in the Champions League?

It is the accusation rival fans have made since 2009, and this collection files the evidence for and against it match by match. Several decisions sit at the extreme edge of normal officiating; several were correct under the written law; and Barcelona also went out of the competition after decisions that went against them. The jury votes on each incident. No page here claims a conspiracy existed.

What does UEFAlona mean?

A portmanteau of UEFA and Barcelona used by rival supporters to suggest the club enjoyed favourable officiating in European competition, especially between 2009 and 2011. It is a fan slur, not an official finding of any kind.

Were Chelsea robbed against Barcelona in 2009?

Chelsea had four penalty appeals rejected in the second leg and went out to a stoppage-time away goal; Didier Drogba called it a disgrace on camera and was banned for it. The referee later acknowledged errors in interviews. The archive files each appeal separately, with the Abidal red card as counter-evidence, and lets the jury score them.

Were the PSG 6–1 decisions correct?

The two late decisions — no penalty for Mascherano's challenge on Di María, and a penalty for Marquinhos' contact on Suárez — remain disputed. Mascherano himself said his challenge was a foul. Both are filed as exhibits with the defence included.

Is the Negreira case part of this collection?

No. It is a separate club-level legal matter about payments to a company linked to a former refereeing official. It involves no allegation against Messi personally and is not evidence about any specific match. If the archive covers it, it will be as a standalone contextual explainer, kept apart from match analysis.

Which Barcelona cases are playable?

All nine match files have a VAR Replay scenario that starts at the minute of the decision with the real tie state: Chelsea 2006 and 2009, Inter 2010, Arsenal 2011, Real Madrid 2011, Milan 2012, Manchester City 2014, Juventus 2015 and PSG 2017.

Elsewhere in the Messi Files

Get the next case by email when it clears review.

One email when the jury closes: the full case file and the internet's final verdicts.

By subscribing you consent to receive an email when a new exhibit opens. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Methodology and disclaimer

Every exhibit starts from a real, source-verified incident: the score, the minute, the referee, the decision as given and what followed are checked against match reports and, where they exist, governing-body statements before filing. The notes then argue both sides on purpose — the prosecution and the defence are each written to be genuinely persuasive, because a straw-man defence would make the archive worthless.

The verdict is the jury's, not ours. Fans vote Fair, Soft VARgentina or Full VARgentina on each exhibit; the votes become a 0–10 score on the VARgentina Meter and the collection figures above are vote-weighted averages of those scores. A high score means fans perceived favour. It does not mean an official erred, and it never means anyone was corrupt.

Cases in research stay unpublished until at least two reliable sources have been checked, the rule context of the era has been reviewed and a usable evidence asset has been located. Pre-2018 incidents are judged against the Laws of the Game as written at the time, not against VAR-era protocol.

VARgentina is a satirical, fan-voted archive of controversial football decisions involving Lionel Messi’s teams. It documents disputed refereeing decisions, contemporary criticism and community opinion. It does not claim proven corruption, match-fixing, bribery or personal wrongdoing by Lionel Messi, FC Barcelona, Argentina, FIFA, UEFA or match officials unless explicitly established by a reliable official source. Results reflect fan opinion, not verified wrongdoing.